Sacramento voters are once again faced with tax increases on the November ballot because Mayor Darrell Steinberg and most of the members of City Council can’t or won’t be honest about their gross spending and particular taste for other people’s money.
So here we are again, solving Sacramento’s latest budget/spending crisis with hefty tax increases.
Sacramento city revenues are more than $120 million up from 2010, and up 16 percent in just the past two years. This is not counting the $50 million Measure U brings in every year. Measure U was a half-cent sales tax sold to voters as necessary to restore the city services cut during the recession. Okay, we’re good.
But we’re not. Measure U is a slush fund for greedy politicians; more is never enough.
Voters are faced with yet another Measure U on the ballot, and this one doubles the half-cent sales tax and makes it permanent, raising Sacramento’s sales tax to 8.75 percent.
California is already ranked at the number 1 top sales tax state in the country with the highest state-level sales tax at 7.25 percent, and a combined rate of 8.54 percent, according to the Tax Foundation. And Sacramento is knocking on the door of even higher sales taxes. Yet, high tax rates cause lower real tax revenue collection, and serve to punish lower income families far more.
In 2012 when Jerry Brown was getting his statewide Proposition 30 sales and income tax increase on the top 1 percent wealthiest Californians, Sacramento city voters also passed Measure U, a “temporary tax” to allow the City to enact a half-cent sales tax for six years with all revenue going to the City’s General Fund.
Proponents claimed the “temporary measure” was needed to stop the loss of city services and jobs blamed on the recession. The City of Sacramento said Measure U was needed to restore and protect City services. “The intent was to restore police and fire services, park maintenance and other essential services that were cut between 2008 and 2013.” The city made it appear unthinkable that voters would deny police, fire and parks their rightful budgets.
Most city residents already noticed the loss of city services along with skyrocketing city utility/services bills, in addition to increasing taxes.
“Budget officials initially projected the tax would generate $31.8 million in the current fiscal year,” sacbee.com reported in 2015. “Instead, Measure U dollars are now expected to reach $41.5 million this year and remain nearly $10 million above original projections for the next four years.”
There’s no such thing as a temporary tax – this lie is used by politicians to get their tax increases passed by gullible voters. Measure U is set to expire in March 2019. So what does Mayor Darrell Steinberg and the City Council do? They put Measure U back on the ballot for November, to double the size of the tax and make it permanent, saying “inclusive economic growth” makes it necessary. “I’m confident when people see what we can do with a full penny, they will respond favorably,” Steinberg said.
Yah, it’s just another penny…
If you aren’t familiar with “inclusive economic growth,” you may want to pour a stiff whiskey when you read,”Inclusive growth is economic growth that is distributed fairly across society and creates opportunities for all,”according to many “Sustainable growth” organizations. It’s largely used in third-world countries, so I’m curious why Sacramento Mayor Darrell Steinberg chose this feel-good wording… unless perhaps he agrees that Sacramento is turning into a third world city.
In 2017, a city report found a 30 percent spike in homelessness over the past two years, which many in the region felt underestimated the problem.
All Tax Increases Are ‘Pension Taxes’
At the root of the financial problem in nearly every California city, as well as at the state, is swelling pension obligations, — though no one in Sacramento City Hall wants to admit this is what the Measure U tax increase is really about. “As the costs of pensions and employee salaries increase, the city of Sacramento is forecasting budget deficits beginning next year,” sacbee.com reported. “Those gaps are expected to reach $25 million by 2022.”
The biggest problem with the old Measure U and the new Measure U is that it is a general tax, which goes directly into the General Fund, without any specific earmarks, as the Mayor would have voters believe. It doesn’t go to pay down the Calpers obligation for unfunded city pensions, nor is it specifically designated to repair and maintain city parks, or to address the exploding homeless population.
Measure U is another blank check for the Mayor and City Council in their quest to turn Sacramento into a “World Class City.” They think they need the money to attract more professional sports teams, build more five star hotels and $4 million condos.
With taxes maxed out on the rich, the Mayor and City Council are now targeting the poor and middle class to keep funding the city government employee pension black hole. There’s no talk among council members of spending cutbacks or real reforms.
Last month, Mayor Steinberg showed his true colors when he forced a collective bargaining agreement with trade unions, without any input from the public. He even shut down two council members who questioned the cost and accountability to taxpayers. Under the agreement, any public construction job in the city costing more than $1 must use union labor. This is another gift to his union thug friends. No one at the city knows what this will cost taxpayers, and Steinberg doesn’t care.
Mayor Darrell Steinberg doesn’t deserve more of taxpayers’ hard-earned money. He’s incapable of fiscal prudence, is tied at the hip to labor unions, and feels nothing about taxing middle-class and low income families more to feed his greed.
Vote NO on Measure U this November.